

Side Impact Protection and Children
An article titled Side Impact Crashes: Physics 101 was published in the March Extranotes and the April CPS Express. This discussed understanding injury, managing energy and minimizing risk. With this article I would like to identify testing methods relative to both motor vehicles and child restraint systems (CRS).
Child restraints are manufactured in accordance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 213. FMVSS 213 includes testing of child restraints in a frontal impact. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines in the United States for child restraints that include side impact crashes.
While there are no regulatory standards or guidelines for testing child restraints in side impact, the following test methods are in place for vehicles: (a) FMVSS 214 – Side Impact Protection (regulatory requirement), (c) New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) (not a regulatory requirement) and (d) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Lateral Test (not a regulatory requirement).
Vehicle manufacturers offer equipment such as side curtain airbags in vehicles to protect the occupant usually starting with the 5th percentile female weighing 105 lbs. Typically it is acceptable to place a CRS next to a side curtain airbag (unless directed otherwise by the vehicle or CRS manufacturer) because a child properly secured in a properly installed CRS would have little to no interaction with a side curtain airbag that is deployed. We as adults put our selves at greater risk when we sleep and lean on side curtain airbags (in the event of deployment of course).
Besides Australia and New Zealand, there are no regulatory requirements concerning the crash protection of restrained children in lateral collisions. Test procedures for consumer information include (a) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Method, (b) Technical University Berlin – Side Impact Procedure of Child Restraint Systems( TUB – SIPCRS) Method, (c) Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil-Club (ADAC) Fixed Door Method, (d) Australian Standard AS/NZS, (e) Takata Sled-on-Sled Method and (f) Britax Child Safety Inc. (BCSI) internal standard.
Keep your eyes open for the next Side Impact Protection and Children article that will provide additional information regarding performance requirements of some of the test methods noted.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at Stilton@BritaxUSA.com.
Submitted by Sarah Tilton, CPS Advocate, Britax Child Safety, Inc. (Charlotte, NC)



Toy Industry Association Hard at Work to Ensure Safe Toys for US Kids
The safety of toys imported to the United States from China has been much in the news since the middle of last year, with toy brands undertaking voluntary recalls of some one percent of toys sold in the US last year. With the safety of children as our industry’s number one priority, these recalls sounded an alarm to which the industry responded immediately. While the US toy industry has for years prided itself on establishing the benchmark toy safety standards for the world, these recalls indicated that a break had occurred in the testing and inspection systems established to confirm compliance with those standards.
The Toy Industry Association (TIA) resolved at once to identify and put into place a long-term solution to this issue that would allow parents to be reassured that toys sold in the US are safe. TIA knew it couldn’t accomplish this on its own and called upon partners from all across society to help them reach that solution. Here is what they have been doing, starting last August.
Working with the US Congress and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), pushing to develop uniform, comprehensive, federal legislation that would provide increased funding and authority to the CPSC, make testing for conformance with toy safety standards mandatory and require that a product certification program be created.Status: Legislation has now passed both houses and is scheduled to go to Conference shortly to resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The toy industry has been urging Congress to move the bill forward expeditiously.
Working with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), to develop a Toy Safety Certification Program (TCSP) that will ensure products are carefully tested for conformity to safety standards. The TSCP has three key requirements for certification: 1) a risk analysis conducted on new toy designs; 2) testing of product conformity to US standards by an accredited laboratory; and, 3) auditing of the safety and quality assurance processes used by the factory producing the toy.

